Original article

Validity of puberty self-report in children and adolescents in Ho Chi Minh City

Tam Minh Doa,*https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7666-7993, Thanh Van Kimahttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2622-9199, Huyen Thi Bich Tranbhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5340-3300, Thanh Thi Kim Tranahttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9601-6880, Minh Xuan Ngoahttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5971-5022, Hong Kim Tangahttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2410-9177
Author Information & Copyright
aPham Ngoc Thach University of Medicine, 02, Duong Quang Trung Street, Ward 12, District 10, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
bChildren’s Hospital No1, 341, Su Van Hanh Street, Ward 10, District 10, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
*Address correspondence: Tam Minh Do at the Pham Ngoc Thach University of Medicine, 02, Duong Quang Trung Street, Ward 12, District 10, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam; E-mails: tamdm@pnt.edu.vn

© Copyright 2023 MedPharmRes. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Apr 28, 2020; Revised: Sep 01, 2020; Accepted: Oct 13, 2020

Published Online: Dec 31, 2020



Puberty is a milestone in child and adolescent development, yet a feasible tool to accurately assess pubertal stage in community context has not been validated in Vietnam.


This study was conducted to validate pubertal self-report among Ho Chi Minh City children and adolescents in comparison with paediatrician’s assessment.


80 girls and 76 boys aged from 6 to 17 years old from 5 schools in Ho Chi Minh City were recruited. Self-administered questionnaires about sexual maturation were distributed to participants and results were compared with physician’s pubertal examination. Kappa statistic and Kendall’s τ b were used to evaluate validity of the questionnaire.


Boys tended to overestimate their development stages while girls tended to underestimate. Fair to almost perfect agreement between students’ reports and paediatricians’ evaluation, along with high concordance was recorded, however younger boys (aged 6-11) showed limited evaluation of their own sexual maturation.


This method was inaccurate to evaluate younger boys’ sexual maturation; however, acceptable accuracy in sexual maturation estimation among younger girls and adolescents could allow it to serve as an effective screening tool in community context.

Keywords: Puberty; child; adolescent; self-report


Puberty is a milestone in child and adolescent development for it is a transition stage characterized by many physical, and psychological changes which lead to rapid and substantial increase in body mass, stature, and thereafter the development of secondary sex characteristics. Body growth spurt occurs in this stage, thus pubertal onset is crucial to be correctly determined in daily clinical practice, especially if the child is undergoing abnormal pubertal maturation process i.e. precocious or delayed puberty.

Puberty status is regularly assessed by paediatricians in daily clinical practice. Medical tests such as invasive tests such as gonadotropin serum concentration or bone age radiography could be performed when abnormal puberty is suspected. Despite the high accuracy in results, these procedures are rarely applied in community research due to lack of human resources or adequate facilities. Self-assessment is an alternative, non-invasive method used to determine pubertal status; however, reported reliability and validity for this vary in literature [1-4]. The noted variations could be attributed to disparities in culture, socioeconomic status, education levels, and ethnics of the study population. In addition, coexisting conditions such as overweight and obesity can make assessment more difficult, especially among girls when assessing for breast assessment [5]. Although previous studies conducted on the Vietnamese population lacked measures of validation for self-assessment, this alternative still appeared in several works [6, 7]. In this research, we evaluated the validity of the puberty self-report questionnaire to provide evidence of a feasible and acceptable tool to accurately assess child and adolescent puberty status.


2.1. Population

Our cross-sectional study adopted the convenience sampling method. Sample size was calculated based on an equation for Kappa statistic estimation of two raters [8] using R function ‘N2.cohen.kappa’. Reference kappa coefficients were extracted from a study of Jaruratanasirikul et al. [2] and a minimum sample size of 40 boys and 60 girls was required. Approval for the study was obtained from Chamber of Education, District 10 and the administration of the selected schools. Study protocols and consent forms were sent out to the parents of children in selected classes among those schools.

Eligibility criterion of the study were as follows: students who were currently enrolled in selected schools were included in the sampling frame; students aging over 18 years old or having deformity that was not capable for demographic measurements were excluded. A total of 156 students (80 girls, 76 boys) in two elementary schools, two junior high schools and one high school were recruited from November 2017 to March 2019; convenient selection of 5 to 9 students of each gender for every grade was conducted by school administrators based on admission list.

2.2. Data collection

Students were informed beforehand to wear light clothes (e.g. sports outfit) when physical measurements were taken. Body weight was measured by an electronic scale, standing stature was measured by a wall mounted stadiometer, weight and height were collected to generate body mass index (BMI). Anthropometric measurements were measured twice and mean values were used for statistical analysis.

Pubertal maturation — genitalia, pubic hair growth (for boys) and breast development (for girls) — was categorized in 5 stages according to Tanner (G1 to G5, PH1 to PH5, B1 to B5, respectively) [9]. Each child was asked to decide his or her maturation stage by checking a Tanner puberty stage self-report questionnaire, which was simply illustrated with drawings and short Vietnamese descriptions depicting 5 developing stages (Figure 1). Brief explanations could be delivered if the sexual and pubertal concepts were not familiar to the participants. After completion of the report, the child was examined by a same-sex paediatrician to determine his or her pubertal stage in a private room with the presence of a researcher. Age of menarche (in girls) and age of adult voice attainment (in boys) were recorded for sexual maturation interpretation using WHO criteria: prepubescent, pubescent, postpubescent [10].

Figure 1. Tanner puberty stages. A. Illustrations in puberty self-report questionnaire for male student. B. Illustrations in puberty self-report questionnaire for female student.
Download Original Figure
2.3. Statistical Analyses

Data analyses were conducted using STATA 14.2 (Stata Corp.). Two sample t test and Fisher’s exact test were used to test the difference of anthropometric measurements among sexes, age groups, and pubertal stages. BMI-for-age z scores were calculated by zanthro command based on WHO Child Growth Standards [11]. Level of significance (α) was set at 0.05.

Students were divided into two age groups: from 6 to 11 years old and older than 11. Justification for the categories was that 11-year-old-and-below children in our sample shared similar characteristics as they were all elementary students, and it was less likely for them to experience puberty onset at that age [6].

Agreement between students’ self-assessment and paediatricians’ assessment was evaluated using kappa statistic. Quadratic weighted κ (Wκ) coefficient results were categorized as follows: less than 0.00 was poor agreement, 0.00 to 0.20 was slight agreement, 0.21 to 0.40 was fair agreement, 0.41 to 0.6 was moderate agreement, 0.61 to 0.80 was substantial agreement, more than 0.80 was almost perfect agreement. The concordance of two assessments measured by Kendall’s τ b was annotated as perfect concordance if Kendall’s τ b was equal to +1, perfect discordance if Kendall’s τ b was equal to -1, and no association if Kendall’s τ b was 0.

2.4. Ethics Approval

This study was approved by Pham Ngoc Thach University Scientific Committee (number of approval: 2305a/QD-TDHYKPNT). Written consent forms were collected from students and parents. Consent forms were presented to parents for signing and thereafter obtained before the start of data collection. The participants reserved the rights to withdraw from our study without any explanation and penalty.


Demographic characteristics of the sample are described in Table 1. In general, most of the characteristics were not significantly different between boys and girls, except for weight. Overweight and obese students accounted for 41.02% of all participants, and half of the cases were allocated in elementary schools.

Table 1: Demographic characteristics of studied population.
Characteristics Boys (n = 76) Girls (n = 80) P values
Age (years)
6 – 11 8.70 (1.22) 8.82 (1.23) P = 0.690
>11 14.32 (1.96) 14.13 (2.08) P = 0.666
Weight (kg) 48.71 (17.89) 42.62 (12.75) P = 0.015
Height (cm) 147.80 (17.99) 143.97 (14.00) P = 0.139
BMI (kg/m2) 21.49 (4.02) 20.16 (3.92) P = 0.038
Thinness (%) 3 (3.95) 5 (6.25)
Normal weight (%) 39 (51.32) 45 (56.25) P = 0.734
Overweight (%) 22 (28.95) 21 (26.25)
Obese (%) 12 (15.79) 9 (11.25)

Data were showed in means (SD) and frequencies (%).

Two sample t test;

‡ Fisher’s exact test.

Download Excel Table

Boys tended to overestimate their pubertal status while opposite pattern was observed in girls. Almost half of the boys determined their genital development higher than their current statuses; 20.27% thought that they were at higher stage in pubic hair development, and only 6.76% thought they were at lower stages. Of all girls, the proportion of underestimation was 33.75% and the proportion of overestimation was 17.5%. There were 8 boys (4 of them were older than 11) whose self-reported sexual maturation could not be determined because age of adult voice attainment came before appropriate genital development (G3).

Agreement analyses revealed that younger boys had limited awareness of their Tanner development stages (p values > 0.05 in all criteria) while their female peers showed better agreement and concordance with paediatricians’ evaluation (Wκ=0.04, p value < 0.05; Kendall’s τ b =0.44, p value < 0.001, respectively) (Table 2). Male adolescents had moderate to almost perfect agreement with paediatricians’ evaluation (genitalia: Wκ=0.59, Kendall’s τ b =0.51; pubic hair: Wκ=0.88, Kendall’s τ b =0.77, all p values < 0.001), whereas female adolescents fairly agreed with paediatricians’ result of their breast development (Wκ=0.38, Kendall’s τ b =0.39, all p values <0.05). Agreement on sexual maturation interpretation ranged from moderate to almost perfect, yet younger boys showed no agreement with experts’ categorization (Wκ=0.01, Kendall’s τ b =0.09, all p values > 0.05).

Table 2: Validity of puberty self-assessment analyses.
Adjusted agreement percentage Weighted κ Kendall’s τb Strength of Agreement
Genitalia 88.7% 0.51 0.52 Moderate
 6 – 11yo 82% 0.03 0.15 Slight
 >11yo 93.6% 0.59 0.51 Moderate
Pubic Hair 97.8% 0.92 0.85 Almost perfect
 6 – 11yo 93.8% 0.12 0.19 Slight
 >11yo 97.3% 0.88 0.77 Almost perfect
Sexual Maturation 90.8% 0.60 0.62 Moderate
 6 – 11yo 84.4% 0.01 0.09 Slight
 >11yo 95.5% 0.70 0.60 Substantial
Breast 95.4% 0.76 0.72 Substantial
 6 – 11yo 94.9% 0.40 0.44 Fair
 >11yo 89.4% 0.38 0.39 Fair
Sexual Maturation 98.1% 0.86 0.85 Almost perfect
 6 – 11yo 95.9% 0.51 0.52 Moderate
 >11yo 97.8%a 0.91‡b 0.91 Almost perfect

a Global agreement and

b unweighted kappa were used due to presence of only 2 categories of sexual maturation among girls of this age.

p values < 0.05;

p values < 0.001

Download Excel Table

Subgroup analysis of pubertal self-report agreement among overweight and obese schoolgirls showed similar result to non-overweight girls. Wκ for breast development agreement in overweight/ obese student group was 0.79 (p <0.001) and the value of this coefficient in non-overweight group was 0.74 (p<0.001). In boys, pubic hair development agreement was also similar across two groups (Wκ=0.95, p<0.001 in overweight/ obese boys; Wκ=0.90, p<0.001 in non-overweight). Higher level of agreement in genital maturation was recorded in non-overweight schoolboys (Wκ = 0.58, p<0.001) in comparison with overweight/ obese group (Wκ = 0.41, p=0.004).

Of all the girls in our study, 50% of them declared to have had their first menstruation. Age at menarche ranged from 7.56 to 14.14 years old; median menarcheal age was 11.54 (95% CI: 10.6 - 12.76) years old. Median age of adult voice attainment in boys was 12.96 (95% CI: 11.7 - 13.50) years old.


This is the first study in Vietnam to assess the possibility of having children and adolescents report their own pubertal status using a Tanner stages paintings questionnaire. Moderate to high level of agreement and concordance were recorded in all three criteria for both sexes.

Elementary male students showed poorest agreement to paediatricians’ assessment results. This could be explained by the fact that children may find it hard to make comparison between their current body appearance and the paintings, especially the development of testicles in boys. Furthermore, primary school students who have not had sex education lessons in the mandatory education scheme may not understand the descriptions thoroughly even if researchers had briefly explained these. To counteract these outcomes several assistive tools could be provided to the child to make assessment easier. One study used a full length mirror for the child to look at his or her body to decide at which stage he or she was [3]. Another study spared a private space in the examining room for the child to undress and self-examine his sexual characteristics prior to Tanner stage decision [12]. In both of the aforementioned studies the genitalia assessment results were higher than our study as Wκ coefficients were 0.60 and 0.63, respectively. However, these two recommendations are quite unfeasible in community setting where the studies are carried out in remote areas with lacked privacy for the child to self-examine. Inaccurate puberty estimation in the self-report method among younger boys, however, yielded little impact in overall interpretation because boys aged from 6 to 11 years old were not likely to experience puberty onset, and delayed puberty was more prevalent in boys than precocious puberty. High level of agreement in breast stages in girls and almost perfect agreement in pubic hair distribution assessment in boys in our study were consistent to other previous findings [1-3].

In terms of sexual maturation interpretation, self-report method showed values as moderate agreement was recorded in male adolescents and moderate to almost perfect agreement was recorded among girls of all ages. However, adult voice was a vague definition for students, especially younger ones, to understand. Misunderstanding may have led to uninterpretable results in our study.

Peterson et al. recommended an interview-based self-reported method to interpret children’s pubertal status, known as Pubertal Development Scale [13]. This method showed advantages as it required least exposure of the child to clinical examinations or sexual maturation photos, therefore, it would be more easily accepted by parents and students. However, this measure insisted a trained health professional to interview and make questions to clarify information when participants expressed confusing feelings about the sexual characteristics or made unsuitable answers.

Age of menarche in our study was a little later than other studies with similar population. Mean menarcheal age was 11.2 years old in a study of junior high school students [6] and median age of menarche was 10 in another study of primary students [14].

While the patterns in overweight and obesity prevalence were similar to other studies done in Vietnam [15, 16], our study found a higher overall prevalence with greater frequency among boys.. Furthermore, Hong et al., in their report, pointed out that there was an increasing trend in overweight and obese prevalence over time and that there were more overweight and obese adolescents in urban areas than rural areas. Our findings may be affected by the sampling area: selected schools were located within centre of Ho Chi Minh City which was a highly developed and “wealthier” area in comparison with others.

Overweight and obesity were concerns to the reliability of breast self-assessment among girls in literature [5]. Our study found no detectable difference in breast development agreement between overweight/ obese and non-overweight students, Wκ coefficient in overweight/ obese group was 0.79, which was higher than another finding in Thailand (Wκ = 0.41) [2].

The strength of our study is the wide age-range of participants which allowed us to investigate validity of puberty self-report questionnaire of different stages of development. The limitations included a small sample size which caused difficulty in result interpretation. Lack of representativeness makes it difficult to generalize our findings to whole population.


Our study provides evidence for the validity of using Tanner pubertal stages self-report questionnaire as a sufficient method to evaluate children and adolescents’ sexual development status. Although this method was inaccurate to evaluate younger boys’ sexual maturation, acceptable accuracy in sexual maturation estimation among younger girls and adolescents could serve as an effective screening tool in community context.


We would like to send our gratefulness to Chamber of Education, People Committee District 10; Administration Committee of Thien Ho Duong Primary School, Le Thi Rieng Primary School, Tran Phu Junior High School, Hoang Van Thu Junior High School, Nguyen Du High School for your cooperation and assistance throughout the study.


This study was supported by Research Fund provided by Pham Ngoc Thach University of Medicine (grant number: 2300/HD-TDHYKPNT).


TMD substantially contributes to conceptual design, acquisition of data, drafting the article; TKV: contributes to acquisition of data, data analysis and interpretation, and revising the article; HTTB: contributes to acquisition of data, data management; TTKT: contributes to data acquisition and data analysis; MXN: contributes to design the study, critically revises the article; HKT: substantially contributes to study design, critically revises the article.


The authors declare no conflict of interest.



Chan NP, Sung RY, Kong AP, Goggins WB, So HK, Nelson EA. Reliability of pubertal self-assessment in Hong Kong Chinese children. Journal of paediatrics and child health. 2008; 44(6):353-8


Jaruratanasirikul S, Kreetapirom P, Tassanakijpanich N, Sriplung H. Reliability of pubertal maturation self-assessment in a school-based survey. Journal of pediatric endocrinology & metabolism : JPEM. 2015; 28(3-4):367-74


Norris SA, Richter LM. Usefulness and Reliability of Tanner Pubertal Self-Rating to Urban Black Adolescents in South Africa. Journal of Research on Adolescence. 2005; 15(4):609-24


Rasmussen AR, Wohlfahrt-Veje C, Tefre de Renzy-Martin K, Hagen CP, Tinggaard J, Mouritsen A, et al. Validity of self-assessment of pubertal maturation. Pediatrics. 2015; 135(1):86-93


Bonat S, Pathomvanich A, Keil MF, Field AE, Yanovski JA. Self-assessment of pubertal stage in overweight children. Pediatrics. 2002; 110(4):743-7


Hong KT. Diet, physical activity, environments and their relationship to the emergence of adolescent overweight and obesity in Ho Chi Minh City. Vietnam [Ph.D Thesis]. Newcastle: University of Newcastle. 2005.


Trang NH, Hong TK, Dibley MJ. Cohort profile: Ho Chi Minh City Youth Cohort--changes in diet, physical activity, sedentary behaviour and relationship with overweight/obesity in adolescents. BMJ open. 2012; 2(1)e000362


Flack VF, Afifi AA, Lachenbruch PA, Schouten H. Sample size determinations for the two rater Kappa statistic. 1988; :321-5 p


Tanner JM. Growth at adolescence, with a general consideration of the effects of hereditary and environmental factors upon growth and maturation from birth to maturity. 2nd ed Oxford:: Blackwell Scientific Publications. 1962.


World Health Organization. Physical status: the use and interpretation of anthropometry. Report of a WHO Expert Committee. World Health Organization technical report series. 1995; 854:1-452


World Health Organization. WHO child growth standards: length/height-for-age, weight-for-age, weight-for-length, weight-for-height and body mass index-for-age: methods and development. 2006..


Rabbani A, Noorian S, Fallah JS, Setoudeh A, Sayarifard F, Abbasi F. Reliability of pubertal self assessment method: an Iranian study. Iranian journal of pediatrics. 2013; 23(3):327-32


Petersen AC, Crockett L, Richards M, Boxer A. A self-report measure of pubertal status: Reliability, validity, and initial norms. Journal of youth and adolescence. 1988; 17(2):117-33


Oanh NTK, Tuan V. Puberty and risk factors among students at the age of 8-11 in center districts in HCMC (2008). Journal of Medicine Ho Chi Minh City. 2009; 13(1):6.


Hong TK, Dibley MJ, Sibbritt D, Binh PN, Trang NH, Hanh TT. Overweight and obesity are rapidly emerging among adolescents in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, 2002-2004. International journal of pediatric obesity : IJPO : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity. 2007; 2(4):194-201


Nguyen PV, Hong TK, Nguyen DT, Robert AR. Excessive screen viewing time by adolescents and body fatness in a developing country: Vietnam. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2016; 25(1):174-83